Page 104 - Genetics_From_Genes_to_Genomes_6th_FULL_Part3
P. 104

398    Chapter 11    Analyzing Genomic Variation


                                   Locus      A       B      C       D      E      F       G      H
                                   Amel       XX     XX     XY      XX     XX      XX     XY      XX
                                   D3S1358   17,18  17,18   14,17  16,17   16,18  13,15  14,16   17,18
                                   D5S818    12,12   —      12,12  12,12   12,12  11,12  12,12   12,12
                                   D13S317   11,11  11,11    —     11,11   11,11  10,14  11,12   11,11
                                   D16S539   11,11  11,11   11,14  11,14    —     10,12  11,14   9,11
                                   D8S1179   13,16  15,16   13,15  13,16   16,16  13,14  15,16   15,16



                  b. Three PCR reactions failed to yield PCR products.   21.  The figure that follows shows DNA fingerprint anal-
                    If the reactions had worked properly, what alleles   ysis of the genomic DNA from semen associated
                    would you expect to see in each case?              with a rape (***) and from mouth swabs (somatic
                  c.  Are any of the daughters identical twins?        cells) of individuals 1–4. This analysis involves the
                  d. What kind of evidence could you obtain from the   PCR amplification of six SSR loci, each from a dif-
                                                                       ferent (nonhomologous) chromosome. All PCR
                    skeletons to differentiate among the daughters?    primers used are 20 nucleotides long; the primers for
                  e.  How do these DNA fingerprints repudiate the      each locus have fluorescent tags in a locus-specific
                    claims of Anna Anderson?                           color. In the gel, some bands are thicker because rel-
                  The DNA fingerprint data in the table are certainly   atively more of the corresponding PCR product was
                  consistent with the idea that some of these skeletons   obtained. The figure has dots aligned on both sides
                  were members of the Tsar’s family, but they do not
                  prove the hypothesis. To investigate further, foren-
                  sic scientists obtained blood samples from Prince
                  Philip (the consort of Queen Elizabeth II of Great
                  Britain) and compared his DNA fingerprint to those
                  obtained from the skeletal remains in Russia. A
                  family genealogy is provided here. The results vali-
                  dated that the Tsar’s family was indeed interred in
                  these graves.


                                    Queen Victoria






                     Tsar                  Tsarina
                   Nicholas II              Alix





                Olga  Tatiana  Maria  Anastasia Tsarevitch
                                             Alexei


                                                     Prince Philip
                  f.  For autosomal DNA markers, what percentage of
                    alleles in the Tsarina’s skeleton should match with
                    alleles in Prince Philip’s genome?
                  g. For autosomal DNA markers, what percentage of
                    alleles in the Tsarevitch’s skeleton should match
                    with alleles in Prince Philip’s genome?
                  h. A question for genealogy aficionados: What is
                    Prince Philip’s relationship with the Tsarina?
   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109